Developers posts on forum
In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com
lord_farquad
Veteran's Challenge, Tier 8
18.11.2012 09:06:45
Subject: Veteran's Challenge, Tier 8
Link on message: #3059604
publord, on Nov 18 2012 - 08:02, said: legs need to be more hairy and grimy.
just think of your average CAP FAST member as one giant sweat trap
Link on message: #3059604
publord, on Nov 18 2012 - 08:02, said: legs need to be more hairy and grimy.just think of your average CAP FAST member as one giant sweat trap
lord_farquad:
There are some images I never want in my head... thanks for bringing ALL of them up
There are some images I never want in my head... thanks for bringing ALL of them up
lord_farquad
Veteran's Challenge, Tier 8
18.11.2012 09:06:45
Subject: Veteran's Challenge, Tier 8
Link on message: #3059604
publord, on Nov 18 2012 - 08:02, said: legs need to be more hairy and grimy.
just think of your average CAP FAST member as one giant sweat trap
Link on message: #3059604
publord, on Nov 18 2012 - 08:02, said: legs need to be more hairy and grimy.just think of your average CAP FAST member as one giant sweat trap
lord_farquad:
There are some images I never want in my head... thanks for bringing ALL of them up
There are some images I never want in my head... thanks for bringing ALL of them up
GeneralDirection
Get rid off all whiners
18.11.2012 08:53:53
Subject: Get rid off all whiners
Link on message: #3059547
Link on message: #3059547
GeneralDirection: A sense of humor is required to be alive. I can't imagine living
without one...
GeneralDirection
Gold Shell equipped M4 and PZ IV are ruining this game.
18.11.2012 08:27:45
Subject: Gold Shell equipped M4 and PZ IV are ruining this game.
Link on message: #3059453
Link on message: #3059453
GeneralDirection: Just to officially "tag" this thread, as SerB and Veider have
mentioned, if we see issues then we will address them. Ultimately
gameplay balance trumps everything.
GeneralDirection
Gold Shell equipped M4 and PZ IV are ruining this game.
18.11.2012 08:27:45
Subject: Gold Shell equipped M4 and PZ IV are ruining this game.
Link on message: #3059453
Link on message: #3059453
GeneralDirection: Just to officially "tag" this thread, as SerB and Veider have
mentioned, if we see issues then we will address them. Ultimately
gameplay balance trumps everything.
GeneralDirection
Veteran's Challenge, Tier 4
18.11.2012 08:08:53
Subject: Veteran's Challenge, Tier 4
Link on message: #3059379
Link on message: #3059379
GeneralDirection: If We Drive Ducks don't exclusively use AMX 40s then I'm going to
protest.
GeneralDirection
Veteran's Challenge, Tier 4
18.11.2012 08:08:53
Subject: Veteran's Challenge, Tier 4
Link on message: #3059379
Link on message: #3059379
GeneralDirection: If We Drive Ducks don't exclusively use AMX 40s then I'm going to
protest.
GeneralDirection
Get rid off all whiners
18.11.2012 08:02:15
Subject: Get rid off all whiners
Link on message: #3059353
Link on message: #3059353
GeneralDirection: Isn't this a "whine" thread by virtue? :P
GeneralDirection
A review of Wargaming.
18.11.2012 07:51:44
Subject: A review of Wargaming.
Link on message: #3059310
Link on message: #3059310
GeneralDirection: We appreciate the enthusiasm, but please don't bump just for the
sake of bumping. 
GeneralDirection
A review of Wargaming.
18.11.2012 07:51:44
Subject: A review of Wargaming.
Link on message: #3059310
Link on message: #3059310
GeneralDirection: We appreciate the enthusiasm, but please don't bump just for the
sake of bumping. 
GeneralDirection
Wait, what?
18.11.2012 07:49:43
Subject: Wait, what?
Link on message: #3059304
Link on message: #3059304
GeneralDirection: The image should still be about Operation Crusader. We'll fix it in
the morning; unfortunately we can't edit the launcher content from
home. The tech tree focus starting Monday is USSR.
GeneralDirection
Wait, what?
18.11.2012 07:49:43
Subject: Wait, what?
Link on message: #3059304
Link on message: #3059304
GeneralDirection: The image should still be about Operation Crusader. We'll fix it in
the morning; unfortunately we can't edit the launcher content from
home. The tech tree focus starting Monday is USSR.
GeneralDirection
Wait, what?
18.11.2012 07:41:51
Subject: Wait, what?
Link on message: #3059279
Link on message: #3059279
GeneralDirection: That is most certainly not intended.
GeneralDirection
Wait, what?
18.11.2012 07:41:51
Subject: Wait, what?
Link on message: #3059279
Link on message: #3059279
GeneralDirection: That is most certainly not intended.
GeneralDirection
Veteran's Challenge, Tier 8
18.11.2012 07:38:25
Subject: Veteran's Challenge, Tier 8
Link on message: #3059274
Link on message: #3059274
GeneralDirection: So... changing the topic. Who do you guys pick as the winner? Some
familiar names in there from Ural Steel and WCG. Will there be an
upset?
GeneralDirection
Veteran's Challenge, Tier 8
18.11.2012 07:38:25
Subject: Veteran's Challenge, Tier 8
Link on message: #3059274
Link on message: #3059274
GeneralDirection: So... changing the topic. Who do you guys pick as the winner? Some
familiar names in there from Ural Steel and WCG. Will there be an
upset?
GeneralDirection
Veteran's Challenge Shoutcast - Turn those replay recordings on!
18.11.2012 07:25:47
Subject: Veteran's Challenge Shoutcast - Turn those replay recordings on!
Link on message: #3059235
Link on message: #3059235
GeneralDirection: Something tells me sr360 sent the replay of Cats vs Fulcrum.
Definitely an... interesting match.
GeneralDirection
Veteran's Challenge Shoutcast - Turn those replay recordings on!
18.11.2012 07:25:47
Subject: Veteran's Challenge Shoutcast - Turn those replay recordings on!
Link on message: #3059235
Link on message: #3059235
GeneralDirection: Something tells me sr360 sent the replay of Cats vs Fulcrum.
Definitely an... interesting match.
GeneralDirection
Veteran's Challenge, Tier 8
18.11.2012 07:22:47
Subject: Veteran's Challenge, Tier 8
Link on message: #3059223
Link on message: #3059223
GeneralDirection: Ah, GorgeousTwink is Antonio? Was wondering.
Either way, chill on the attempts to funnily pun a team's name. As it turns out, it isn't funny and is pushing the rules pretty hard.
Either way, chill on the attempts to funnily pun a team's name. As it turns out, it isn't funny and is pushing the rules pretty hard.
GeneralDirection
Veteran's Challenge, Tier 8
18.11.2012 07:22:47
Subject: Veteran's Challenge, Tier 8
Link on message: #3059223
Link on message: #3059223
GeneralDirection: Ah, GorgeousTwink is Antonio? Was wondering.
Either way, chill on the attempts to funnily pun a team's name. As it turns out, it isn't funny and is pushing the rules pretty hard.
Either way, chill on the attempts to funnily pun a team's name. As it turns out, it isn't funny and is pushing the rules pretty hard.
GeneralDirection
Tier 4 nailbiter.
18.11.2012 07:18:29
Subject: Tier 4 nailbiter.
Link on message: #3059210
Link on message: #3059210
GeneralDirection: Guys, we don't need or want attitudes like this. With all
competitive situations someone is going to come out on top. Accept
it, move on and figure out how to not let it happen next time.
GeneralDirection
Tier 4 nailbiter.
18.11.2012 07:18:29
Subject: Tier 4 nailbiter.
Link on message: #3059210
Link on message: #3059210
GeneralDirection: Guys, we don't need or want attitudes like this. With all
competitive situations someone is going to come out on top. Accept
it, move on and figure out how to not let it happen next time.
Captain_Judo
Veteran's Challenge, Tier 4
18.11.2012 06:47:27
Subject: Veteran's Challenge, Tier 4
Link on message: #3059062
Link on message: #3059062
Captain_Judo: Our quarterfinals are scheduled!
Hypnotik's Cuddlefest VS The MOB
DFW VS S.I.M.P.
BLOOD & THUNDER VS RagTag
1ad VS We Drive Ducks
Good luck to all tankers involved in tomorrow's final day
Hypnotik's Cuddlefest VS The MOB
DFW VS S.I.M.P.
BLOOD & THUNDER VS RagTag
1ad VS We Drive Ducks
Good luck to all tankers involved in tomorrow's final day
Captain_Judo
Veteran's Challenge, Tier 6
18.11.2012 06:43:51
Subject: Veteran's Challenge, Tier 6
Link on message: #3059049
Link on message: #3059049
Captain_Judo: Our quarterfinals are scheduled!
-.- -ESC- -.- VS Black Sheep
CAP FAST VS WAR - River of Blood
MONKEYS OF THE ROTA VS Newland
Netwarriors VS TNT Canada Returns
Congratulations! And good luck, tomorrow
-.- -ESC- -.- VS Black Sheep
CAP FAST VS WAR - River of Blood
MONKEYS OF THE ROTA VS Newland
Netwarriors VS TNT Canada Returns
Congratulations! And good luck, tomorrow
Captain_Judo
Veteran's Challenge, Tier 8
18.11.2012 06:38:43
Subject: Veteran's Challenge, Tier 8
Link on message: #3059017
Link on message: #3059017
Captain_Judo: Our quarterfinals are scheduled!
Buischti VS Leftover G's
HZRD VS SIMPLISTIC
ACA PendeViejos VS Lettuce Turnip The Beet
Fulcrum Gaming VS S.I.M.P.
Get some rest, gentlemen. Tomorrow we crown one of these eight teams, champion!
Buischti VS Leftover G's
HZRD VS SIMPLISTIC
ACA PendeViejos VS Lettuce Turnip The Beet
Fulcrum Gaming VS S.I.M.P.
Get some rest, gentlemen. Tomorrow we crown one of these eight teams, champion!
lord_farquad
Clearing the air...
18.11.2012 05:50:31
Subject: Clearing the air...
Link on message: #3058789
Link on message: #3058789
lord_farquad: Well ladies & gentlemen, I am unfortunately headed home for the
evening, and as I think this thread has likely gone as far as it
can, constructively, I will be requesting that the thread be
closed. I hope that everyone was able to enjoy the tournament so
far despite this event, which in the grand scheme of things I
believe is a fairly small issue.
I hope everyone enjoys the the rest of the tournament, and know that we will be providing the feedback to get the system changed so that bans during Special Battles occur after the battle not during.
I'd also like to thank both Tank and Yankee for trying to reduce the collateral here.
I hope everyone enjoys the the rest of the tournament, and know that we will be providing the feedback to get the system changed so that bans during Special Battles occur after the battle not during.
I'd also like to thank both Tank and Yankee for trying to reduce the collateral here.
lord_farquad
Clearing the air...
18.11.2012 05:40:05
Subject: Clearing the air...
Link on message: #3058750
tankanspank, on Nov 18 2012 - 05:35, said: You just contradicted your self .. wanna try again
Link on message: #3058750
tankanspank, on Nov 18 2012 - 05:35, said: You just contradicted your self .. wanna try againlord_farquad: I think he was trying to make two separate points. His point was,
even if he had known, it would still have been an issue.
Ultimately, it's my fault for not foreseeing the issue, and I
apologize. If you need to blame someone please blame me. The GMs
are only trying to keep the game clean.
lord_farquad
Clearing the air...
18.11.2012 05:34:51
Subject: Clearing the air...
Link on message: #3058717
tankanspank, on Nov 18 2012 - 05:29, said: Farquad as you know i respect the hell out of you . We have been
playing these tanks for over a year together . However you couldn't
be more wrong in this case . As Bar stated they where just talking
about the people still in the tourny and Sgtgrunt over heard them ,
took it upon himself to drop the ban hammer during the match . Even
though there was no complaint made !!!
If that is'nt MOD manipulation then what is ??
Link on message: #3058717
tankanspank, on Nov 18 2012 - 05:29, said: Farquad as you know i respect the hell out of you . We have been
playing these tanks for over a year together . However you couldn't
be more wrong in this case . As Bar stated they where just talking
about the people still in the tourny and Sgtgrunt over heard them ,
took it upon himself to drop the ban hammer during the match . Even
though there was no complaint made !!!If that is'nt MOD manipulation then what is ??
lord_farquad: I appreciate that and ask that you believe me when I say this was
not Grunt's intention at all (he in fact did a facepalm, right in
front of me, when he found out that it was during a tournament). If
anything, I should have asked that name changes be run by myself as
well. So if anything it's my fault for not taking the necessary
precautions, this isn't something I foresaw being an issue. So I
apologize for that. We will definitely try to take precautions next
time, but I think everyone should pay special attention to this
scenario in the future, as team captains now know what to do to
avoid having similar issues.
Grunt wasn't aware of the context. Thus he had no idea it was during a tournament. He simply discovered a name that required banning, and did what he is here to do.
Grunt wasn't aware of the context. Thus he had no idea it was during a tournament. He simply discovered a name that required banning, and did what he is here to do.
lord_farquad
Clearing the air...
18.11.2012 05:27:33
Subject: Clearing the air...
Link on message: #3058674
Tzimon, on Nov 18 2012 - 05:22, said: If you think that it's correct to hand out bans to people for
offensive names when it is imo very subjective w/o any warning or
notice than my opinion of WG and the way things are being done just
sank even lower.
Because it shows that nothing has changed or WG doesn't feel like they did anything wrong after the STFU clan disband fiasco.
Link on message: #3058674
Tzimon, on Nov 18 2012 - 05:22, said: If you think that it's correct to hand out bans to people for
offensive names when it is imo very subjective w/o any warning or
notice than my opinion of WG and the way things are being done just
sank even lower.Because it shows that nothing has changed or WG doesn't feel like they did anything wrong after the STFU clan disband fiasco.
lord_farquad: Straight from the game rules: "3.01 that contain profanity,
including its abbreviated form." which you can find here
This had nothing to do with what occurred during the STFU issue, different people, different system.
This had nothing to do with what occurred during the STFU issue, different people, different system.
lord_farquad
Clearing the air...
18.11.2012 05:16:32
Subject: Clearing the air...
Link on message: #3058624
stupidanimal182, on Nov 18 2012 - 05:14, said: I suppose im jumping to the conclusion accusing G before i had all
the facts. But at least we all can agree this is a horrible time
for a ban. When we were accepted to the tourny then the names
should be approved. Banning someone durring mid battle of this
tourny is in of its self intent. I respect Farquad, but do dont
know if i believe grunt nor do other people.
Link on message: #3058624
stupidanimal182, on Nov 18 2012 - 05:14, said: I suppose im jumping to the conclusion accusing G before i had all
the facts. But at least we all can agree this is a horrible time
for a ban. When we were accepted to the tourny then the names
should be approved. Banning someone durring mid battle of this
tourny is in of its self intent. I respect Farquad, but do dont
know if i believe grunt nor do other people.lord_farquad: I believe grunt did exactly what he should have. Obviously he can't
be aware of everyone's participation in every event.
Also, the system normally waits until after a battle to ban someone, it seems that only during Special Battles is this an issue. I think the solution here is for us to simply provide this feedback to the devs, as I think Special Battles should work the same way.
Also, the system normally waits until after a battle to ban someone, it seems that only during Special Battles is this an issue. I think the solution here is for us to simply provide this feedback to the devs, as I think Special Battles should work the same way.
lord_farquad
Clearing the air...
18.11.2012 05:08:25
Subject: Clearing the air...
Link on message: #3058583
tankanspank, on Nov 18 2012 - 05:04, said: Yankee i believe you and i believe Bar as well . There
should be no member of DOS in this thread blaming Bar or
a member of -G- again .
I do however think that Sgt_grunt let his personal feelings about DOS affect the outcome ..
TY for you post Yankee
Link on message: #3058583
tankanspank, on Nov 18 2012 - 05:04, said: Yankee i believe you and i believe Bar as well . There
should be no member of DOS in this thread blaming Bar or
a member of -G- again .I do however think that Sgt_grunt let his personal feelings about DOS affect the outcome ..
TY for you post Yankee
lord_farquad: For the record, Sgtgrunt was not even aware that he was
participating in the tournament. It's not possible for every GM/Mod
to know the tournament involvement of every player.
Captain_Judo
Veteran's Challenge, Tier 6
18.11.2012 04:59:18
Subject: Veteran's Challenge, Tier 6
Link on message: #3058514
Link on message: #3058514
Captain_Judo: And with this massive result...
BrOgre's Nest of Simpers 2:3 Netwarriors
We are ready to proceed to tonight's last playoff round. Battles are scheduled- 30 minutes until showtime!
BrOgre's Nest of Simpers 2:3 Netwarriors
We are ready to proceed to tonight's last playoff round. Battles are scheduled- 30 minutes until showtime!
lord_farquad
Veteran's Challenge, Tier 8
18.11.2012 04:47:44
Subject: Veteran's Challenge, Tier 8
Link on message: #3058405
Verilogus, on Nov 18 2012 - 04:37, said: That's not at all obvious. Points could be assigned just to weed
out the weak teams, since only 2 could get through each division
and there may be tie breakers points made perfect sense. Using them
to then assign placements in a followup NEW structure tournament is
not at all obvious or even reasonable. You are aware than some
divisions got more teams than others? Compromising your reasoning
behind seeding teams based on points.
Link on message: #3058405
Verilogus, on Nov 18 2012 - 04:37, said: That's not at all obvious. Points could be assigned just to weed
out the weak teams, since only 2 could get through each division
and there may be tie breakers points made perfect sense. Using them
to then assign placements in a followup NEW structure tournament is
not at all obvious or even reasonable. You are aware than some
divisions got more teams than others? Compromising your reasoning
behind seeding teams based on points.lord_farquad: This is exactly how we have handled previous qualifiers, I don't
see why it would change now.
And yes, I'm aware there were different numbers in different divisions, fortunately we seeded them accordingly.
And yes, I'm aware there were different numbers in different divisions, fortunately we seeded them accordingly.
lord_farquad
Veteran's Challenge, Tier 8
18.11.2012 04:47:44
Subject: Veteran's Challenge, Tier 8
Link on message: #3058405
Verilogus, on Nov 18 2012 - 03:37, said: That's not at all obvious. Points could be assigned just to weed
out the weak teams, since only 2 could get through each division
and there may be tie breakers points made perfect sense. Using them
to then assign placements in a followup NEW structure tournament is
not at all obvious or even reasonable. You are aware than some
divisions got more teams than others? Compromising your reasoning
behind seeding teams based on points.
Link on message: #3058405
Verilogus, on Nov 18 2012 - 03:37, said: That's not at all obvious. Points could be assigned just to weed
out the weak teams, since only 2 could get through each division
and there may be tie breakers points made perfect sense. Using them
to then assign placements in a followup NEW structure tournament is
not at all obvious or even reasonable. You are aware than some
divisions got more teams than others? Compromising your reasoning
behind seeding teams based on points.lord_farquad:
This is exactly how we have handled previous qualifiers, I don't see why it would change now.
And yes, I'm aware there were different numbers in different divisions, fortunately we seeded them accordingly.
This is exactly how we have handled previous qualifiers, I don't see why it would change now.
And yes, I'm aware there were different numbers in different divisions, fortunately we seeded them accordingly.
lord_farquad
Veteran's Challenge, Tier 8
18.11.2012 04:47:44
Subject: Veteran's Challenge, Tier 8
Link on message: #3058405
Verilogus, on Nov 18 2012 - 03:37, said: That's not at all obvious. Points could be assigned just to weed
out the weak teams, since only 2 could get through each division
and there may be tie breakers points made perfect sense. Using them
to then assign placements in a followup NEW structure tournament is
not at all obvious or even reasonable. You are aware than some
divisions got more teams than others? Compromising your reasoning
behind seeding teams based on points.
Link on message: #3058405
Verilogus, on Nov 18 2012 - 03:37, said: That's not at all obvious. Points could be assigned just to weed
out the weak teams, since only 2 could get through each division
and there may be tie breakers points made perfect sense. Using them
to then assign placements in a followup NEW structure tournament is
not at all obvious or even reasonable. You are aware than some
divisions got more teams than others? Compromising your reasoning
behind seeding teams based on points.lord_farquad:
This is exactly how we have handled previous qualifiers, I don't see why it would change now.
And yes, I'm aware there were different numbers in different divisions, fortunately we seeded them accordingly.
This is exactly how we have handled previous qualifiers, I don't see why it would change now.
And yes, I'm aware there were different numbers in different divisions, fortunately we seeded them accordingly.
Captain_Judo
Veteran's Challenge, Tier 8
18.11.2012 04:46:55
Subject: Veteran's Challenge, Tier 8
Link on message: #3058400
Verilogus, on Nov 18 2012 - 04:37, said: That's not at all obvious. Points could be assigned just to weed
out the weak teams, since only 2 could get through each division
and there may be tie breakers points made perfect sense. Using them
to then assign placements in a followup NEW structure tournament is
not at all obvious or even reasonable. You are aware than some
divisions got more teams than others? Compromising your reasoning
behind seeding teams based on points.
Link on message: #3058400
Verilogus, on Nov 18 2012 - 04:37, said: That's not at all obvious. Points could be assigned just to weed
out the weak teams, since only 2 could get through each division
and there may be tie breakers points made perfect sense. Using them
to then assign placements in a followup NEW structure tournament is
not at all obvious or even reasonable. You are aware than some
divisions got more teams than others? Compromising your reasoning
behind seeding teams based on points.Captain_Judo: We sorted all teams based on points earned in the qualifying round.
The fact that teams played variable games carried no significant
impact on seeding.
lord_farquad
Veteran's Challenge, Tier 8
18.11.2012 04:34:35
Subject: Veteran's Challenge, Tier 8
Link on message: #3058304
Verilogus, on Nov 18 2012 - 04:30, said: Nice of you not telling us that before. Was FORGE aware of that?
Link on message: #3058304
Verilogus, on Nov 18 2012 - 04:30, said: Nice of you not telling us that before. Was FORGE aware of that?lord_farquad: That's the whole point of a qualifier round., otherwise there would
be no need to assign point values.
lord_farquad
Veteran's Challenge, Tier 8
18.11.2012 04:34:35
Subject: Veteran's Challenge, Tier 8
Link on message: #3058304
Verilogus, on Nov 18 2012 - 03:30, said: Nice of you not telling us that before. Was FORGE aware of
that?
Link on message: #3058304
Verilogus, on Nov 18 2012 - 03:30, said: Nice of you not telling us that before. Was FORGE aware of
that?lord_farquad:
That's the whole point of a qualifier round., otherwise there would be no need to assign point values.
That's the whole point of a qualifier round., otherwise there would be no need to assign point values.
lord_farquad
Veteran's Challenge, Tier 8
18.11.2012 04:34:35
Subject: Veteran's Challenge, Tier 8
Link on message: #3058304
Verilogus, on Nov 18 2012 - 03:30, said: Nice of you not telling us that before. Was FORGE aware of
that?
Link on message: #3058304
Verilogus, on Nov 18 2012 - 03:30, said: Nice of you not telling us that before. Was FORGE aware of
that?lord_farquad:
That's the whole point of a qualifier round., otherwise there would be no need to assign point values.
That's the whole point of a qualifier round., otherwise there would be no need to assign point values.
Captain_Judo
Veteran's Challenge, Tier 4
18.11.2012 04:33:28
Subject: Veteran's Challenge, Tier 4
Link on message: #3058297
Link on message: #3058297
Captain_Judo: Good games everyone. One playoff round, in one hour, remaining for
the night. Good luck
Реклама | Adv