Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Developers posts on forum

In this section you'll find posts from the official developers forum. The base is updated every hour and stored on a server wot-news.com. If you encounter any bugs, have suggestions or comments, write to info@wot-news.com

Filter by developers

The last day   In the last 7 days   Over a period from   till     

Developer
Subject
Link
Over a period
Image
Hunter1911
Hmm, rammer or gun layer......
arrow
20.12.2013 12:36:58
 
Subject: Hmm, rammer or gun layer......
Link on message: #6754183

Hunter1911: I think the decision is pretty much unanimous. Rammer is a must in most tanks, especially those relying on DPM. It mandatory equipment on almost all tanks of mine. GLD is a nice piece of tech as well, but I personally would prioritize the rammer, without much thinking.


TheKroo
Hmm, rammer or gun layer......
arrow
20.12.2013 12:36:58
 
Subject: Hmm, rammer or gun layer......
Link on message: #6754183

TheKroo: I think the decision is pretty much unanimous. Rammer is a must in most tanks, especially those relying on DPM. It mandatory equipment on almost all tanks of mine. GLD is a nice piece of tech as well, but I personally would prioritize the rammer, without much thinking.


PanzerGert
Lust auf einen IS-6?
arrow
20.12.2013 12:31:48
 
Subject: Lust auf einen IS-6?
Link on message: #6754124

{lang:macro__view_post}Subai, on 20 December 2013 - 09:01 AM, said: Jap, schon schön das das nicht funktioniert . . . . . Kriegt man von WG auch eigentlich dazu auch ein Feedback . . . eher nicht vermute ich mal . . . .

PanzerGert: Das wurde bereits weitergeleitet und wird gerade geklärt. Ich gehe jedoch davon aus das es beabsichtigt ist die doppelten XP nicht einzurechnen, da ansonsten die Mission praktisch entwertet und doch recht einfach würde.


Hunter1911
Going to tier 3 soon, but need to decide...
arrow
20.12.2013 12:29:22
 
Subject: Going to tier 3 soon, but need to decide...
Link on message: #6754097

Hunter1911: Go for Wespe and Panzer III A. Wespe is quite fun low tier arty and leads to interesting older brothers.   Panzer III A is a cool tank, and leads to Pz III which is loads of fun.


TheKroo
Going to tier 3 soon, but need to decide...
arrow
20.12.2013 12:29:22
 
Subject: Going to tier 3 soon, but need to decide...
Link on message: #6754097

TheKroo: Go for Wespe and Panzer III A. Wespe is quite fun low tier arty and leads to interesting older brothers.   Panzer III A is a cool tank, and leads to Pz III which is loads of fun.


Hunter1911
Would like some help with a couple of things
arrow
20.12.2013 12:25:48
 
Subject: Would like some help with a couple of things
Link on message: #6754048

Hunter1911: Scouting is quite a difficult discipline to do well. You need to know the maps well, your and enemy tanks well in order to achieve success.   I recommend having a look at this guide.


TheKroo
Would like some help with a couple of things
arrow
20.12.2013 12:25:48
 
Subject: Would like some help with a couple of things
Link on message: #6754048

TheKroo: Scouting is quite a difficult discipline to do well. You need to know the maps well, your and enemy tanks well in order to achieve success.   I recommend having a look at this guide.


Hunter1911
IS-7 "Autoloader"
arrow
20.12.2013 12:20:51
 
Subject: IS-7 "Autoloader"
Link on message: #6753990

View PostVlevs, on 20 December 2013 - 02:33 AM, said:   Can't disagree on the internet urban legend. Imagination (and national pride) tends to fill any gaps in knowledge. Still, some quite knowledgeable people are convinced of IS-7's excellency as a machine, and I really can't say I know any better. But some things I do disagree with.   First, armor protection. I really can't say how faithful WG has been in this regard, but frontal protection should be very good. So good, that I can't think of any weapon prior to 105 mm L7 APDS (1959) going through it at range. Early HEAT munitions were quite sensitive to angle, and IS-7's front has plenty of that. IS-7 is immune to Bazooka and PIAT at any horizontal angle.   Second, anti-armor performance is strong for the era, and doesn't seem to fall short of 120 mm L1, thus easily defeating any western tank until Chieftain (1966). This gives the design 10 years of immunity against rivals. Also, IS-7 was in theory possible to up-gun to 130 mm M-65 gun that could fire APDS, thus making it relevant up to 1980s.   Third, it's been mentioned that IS-7 prorotypes were more reliable than contemporary T-54 protos. The one that caught fire had supposedly reached the end of its engine's service life. Yes, a tank that spontaneously combusts when its 'warranty' runs out is a bit troublesome.   Fourth, the tank's power-to-weight ratio is close to T-54's and its height is similar. Both of these are better than contemporary western tanks, so saying it's a sluggish large target is wrong. Also it would've fit within Soviet railway loading gauge, and thus was rail-transportable. None of the Cold War tanks was transportable in western European rails. I can't see IS-7 exhibiting Maus-levels of logistical planning fail.

Hunter1911:   IS-7 was for sure a fine and "luxurious" tank. Sadly it had the traditional flaw many German tanks shared with it - it was over-engineered and quite heavy(too heavy in Soviet eyes).


TheKroo
IS-7 "Autoloader"
arrow
20.12.2013 12:20:51
 
Subject: IS-7 "Autoloader"
Link on message: #6753990

View PostVlevs, on 20 December 2013 - 02:33 AM, said:   Can't disagree on the internet urban legend. Imagination (and national pride) tends to fill any gaps in knowledge. Still, some quite knowledgeable people are convinced of IS-7's excellency as a machine, and I really can't say I know any better. But some things I do disagree with.   First, armor protection. I really can't say how faithful WG has been in this regard, but frontal protection should be very good. So good, that I can't think of any weapon prior to 105 mm L7 APDS (1959) going through it at range. Early HEAT munitions were quite sensitive to angle, and IS-7's front has plenty of that. IS-7 is immune to Bazooka and PIAT at any horizontal angle.   Second, anti-armor performance is strong for the era, and doesn't seem to fall short of 120 mm L1, thus easily defeating any western tank until Chieftain (1966). This gives the design 10 years of immunity against rivals. Also, IS-7 was in theory possible to up-gun to 130 mm M-65 gun that could fire APDS, thus making it relevant up to 1980s.   Third, it's been mentioned that IS-7 prorotypes were more reliable than contemporary T-54 protos. The one that caught fire had supposedly reached the end of its engine's service life. Yes, a tank that spontaneously combusts when its 'warranty' runs out is a bit troublesome.   Fourth, the tank's power-to-weight ratio is close to T-54's and its height is similar. Both of these are better than contemporary western tanks, so saying it's a sluggish large target is wrong. Also it would've fit within Soviet railway loading gauge, and thus was rail-transportable. None of the Cold War tanks was transportable in western European rails. I can't see IS-7 exhibiting Maus-levels of logistical planning fail.

TheKroo:   IS-7 was for sure a fine and "luxurious" tank. Sadly it had the traditional flaw many German tanks shared with it - it was over-engineered and quite heavy(too heavy in Soviet eyes).


Hunter1911
E-75
arrow
20.12.2013 12:14:03
 
Subject: E-75
Link on message: #6753923

View Postfiladendro, on 19 December 2013 - 11:39 PM, said: Ma nema sta da te iznenadi,bice sigurno promena,za sigurno sporije punjenje ili po meni za sigurno smanjice probojnost(pen.)topa,uz mogucnosti oduzimanja tier 9 motora.

Hunter1911:   Na temelju cega ovo pretpostavljas? Ovo nisu sitne promjene.


TheKroo
E-75
arrow
20.12.2013 12:14:03
 
Subject: E-75
Link on message: #6753923

View Postfiladendro, on 19 December 2013 - 11:39 PM, said: Ma nema sta da te iznenadi,bice sigurno promena,za sigurno sporije punjenje ili po meni za sigurno smanjice probojnost(pen.)topa,uz mogucnosti oduzimanja tier 9 motora.

TheKroo:   Na temelju cega ovo pretpostavljas? Ovo nisu sitne promjene.


IPaul72
Can't WoT players stop insulting in every occassion?
arrow
20.12.2013 12:04:05
 
Subject: Can't WoT players stop insulting in every occassion?
Link on message: #6753811

{lang:macro__view_post}Dathdeath, on 18 December 2013 - 03:29 PM, said: STFU is not an insult its an order, you don't need to do what others say.   On the screens you are as a T5 tank in T8 battles, and its not even a good t5 tank, its the premium churchill! Why do you think has it its special mm? Its too bad for a +/-2 MM, thats why its limited to tier6. You brought a useless tank to a higher tier battle and now you fell insulted because the others didn't find this joke funny. A platoon like this is called "troll platoon" by the playerbase , so if you have trolled your team, why shouldn't they troll you?   Nobody gets insulted if they do something for the team, but if you drag your team down like this then an insult is not the worst what you could receive. But blame your platoon partner because he took you there, the reaction of the players was only natural, because troll platoons are not playing for their own team, you were the 16th enemy player, which your team couldn't just kill.    

IPaul72:   Seasons Greetings Dathdeath I must say I disagree with your opening statement not only is it an insult its rude to boot, as we all know it is an acronym for a sentence I will not repeat on here. Therefore even in the army most people don't talk to each other like this! Lets say you were walking down the street and said this to someone you didn't know (pretty much the same as the net) chances are you wouldn't be on you feet for long.    Having a huge amount of battles doesn't give anyone a sheriff's badge (this is what I fail to understand) rather than being rude (which I'm happy to say a minority are) why not let others learn from your vast experience of the game. I know some players who have 25k plus battles and they are perfectly nice people and spend their time teaching others (see this is what I call forward thinking) because they see the bigger picture, they understand by teaching others the game skills will increase over all and when the pupil reaches a level they will then do the same by teaching others.  Ok just an example (maybe not a good one) Lets say you see a horse (not that I'm saying there are any horses that play on here) and he is angry at you (bare with me on this) do you: A. poke it with a stick just to see if it really is mad! B. Starting shouting abuse at it! C. Talk to it in a calm voice easing it's temper!   I would say if you went for a. or b. you need a rewire! Simply because .... by making a friend (gaining its trust) of the horse and gaining its trust .... you now have transportation (once you have broke it in) if there wouldn't have been horses, there possibly wouldn't have been the need for faster and bigger transportation. So as a result if someone hadn't have thought of this, (seen the bigger picture) maybe we would have fancy stilt legs with springs! (instead of cars, tanks, planes ect) we would then have probably been playing a game called World of Stilts! (Or maybe we wouldn't have been playing at all)  So in reflection it would be a different story if someone would have insulted the horse and kept telling it to .... well ya know! So in essence this is how early mankind evolved ....see where I'm going with this! Ok enough of my rambling ....   Have a nice day and happy tanking! Seasonal Regards    IPaul72


vuque
Girls und Panzer & Japon Tankları - Yaratıcı Afiş Yarışması
arrow
20.12.2013 11:20:41
 
Subject: Girls und Panzer & Japon Tankları - Yaratıcı Afiş Yarışması
Link on message: #6753372

vuque: Hepinize çok teşekkürler katılımınız için, katılımlar bu yarışma için sonlanmıştır. En kısa süre içerisinde sonuçları bildirmeye çalışacağız :great:


IPaul72
Clan Nominations
arrow
20.12.2013 11:10:40
 
Subject: Clan Nominations
Link on message: #6753266

{lang:macro__view_post}Panzer_VII_07, on 19 December 2013 - 11:33 PM, said: Clan: D-B-C Commander: royalMP Diplomat: Panzer_VII_07   Commandership has changed and I would like to trade positions.

IPaul72: Done :smile:


LiannaSilverwind
How to farm and manipulate WN8?
arrow
20.12.2013 11:06:38
 
Subject: How to farm and manipulate WN8?
Link on message: #6753231

{lang:macro__view_post}Homer_J, on 20 December 2013 - 01:16 AM, said: Play high tiers, do lots of damage, win.

LiannaSilverwind:   No and no. Wn8 is extremely weak formula that is very easy to be manipulated.   Short guide: Tier 2, 2 000+ battles, 4 000 WN8.   Proof: http://www.noobmeter.com/player/eu/ScarlettJohansson/509450590/

{lang:macro__view_post}Tamosius, on 20 December 2013 - 07:56 AM, said: The purpose of wn8 is that it is hard to cheat it. Just play less with stock tanks, play tanks you are good at. Also you can play tanks which are useless with stock shells, so play them using premium shells.

LiannaSilverwind:


Brynd
Special: 2013 Retrospective
arrow
20.12.2013 00:08:45
 
Subject: Special: 2013 Retrospective
Link on message: #6751058

Brynd: I'm sorry for my Mum who's visiting me tomorrow: it seems I now have Tank plans this weekend. :playing:


vuque
WoT ile Güne Merhaba - 2
arrow
19.12.2013 20:40:34
 
Subject: WoT ile Güne Merhaba - 2
Link on message: #6749399

vuque: Ödül isteğini aşağıdaki şekilde girmiş bulunmaktayım, bugün ödüllerin hesabınıza geçmiş olması gerekiyor. Eğer hesabınıza geçmeyen bir altın durumu varsa özel mesaj ile bana ulaşın ki kontrolünü yapabilelim :great:   serdar1981 1050 eren1453 500 nsklnts 500 tankiller61 750 JenifferLee 700 MAXIMUS786 600 bigthunder 500 _Kafkas_Kartall_ 200 Ephemerich 350 durum_normal 250 eren1453 350 satukblade 150 hunterofthehead 150 x_Thanatos_x 50 II_SlaTeR_II 50 Patagons 50


Ectar
Special: 2013 Retrospective
arrow
19.12.2013 20:17:14
 
Subject: Special: 2013 Retrospective
Link on message: #6749194

Ectar: An entire weekend of double exp guys! It's not just for your first battle it's active for every battle!  


Dakiras
Best tank to choice
arrow
19.12.2013 19:51:56
 
Subject: Best tank to choice
Link on message: #6748968

Dakiras: As Norrin said, it's very much based on what you like to play and how you play. Different tanks suit different people. :smile:


Hunter1911
Serious Question - Has the MM been changed for Chistmas?
arrow
19.12.2013 19:45:59
 
Subject: Serious Question - Has the MM been changed for Chistmas?
Link on message: #6748926

Hunter1911: Yes we changed it    Joke aside; No alterations to the MM have been done recently. It is probably just a roll of bad luck...


TheKroo
Serious Question - Has the MM been changed for Chistmas?
arrow
19.12.2013 19:45:59
 
Subject: Serious Question - Has the MM been changed for Chistmas?
Link on message: #6748926

TheKroo: Yes we changed it    Joke aside; No alterations to the MM have been done recently. It is probably just a roll of bad luck...


TheyCallMeHans
Serious Question - Has the MM been changed for Chistmas?
arrow
19.12.2013 19:45:59
 
Subject: Serious Question - Has the MM been changed for Chistmas?
Link on message: #6748926

TheyCallMeHans: Yes we changed it    Joke aside; No alterations to the MM have been done recently. It is probably just a roll of bad luck...


Hunter1911
First Public Test of Update 8.10
arrow
19.12.2013 19:41:51
 
Subject: First Public Test of Update 8.10
Link on message: #6748892

View PostThe_Boot, on 18 December 2013 - 04:53 PM, said: the background motion blur when you look around or zoom in is awful, I want to kill tanks not be amazed by the land scape. a good landscape is one burning and riddled with shell marks and destroyed vehicles, am I wrong?   get rid of the motion blur...

Hunter1911:   For quite a lot of people the visual look of the game, the graphics and other content which set them mood are quite important. Agreed, gameplay and content are integral, but making the game look better should not be a negative thing. Why not be amazed by the landscape? Visually nicely portrayed map and appropriating visuals will in great length add to the general mood of the game you play.  

View PostThe_Boot, on 18 December 2013 - 04:56 PM, said: leave the graphic as they are, and concentrate on MM or new maps or even lag. I think the vast majority of the WoT community want better content than better lighting effects and rolling cloud shadow...

Hunter1911:   We are talking about different departments, different specialties. Map designers, graphic editors, data analysts and general coders are not really one and the same. It is not possible just to redirect everyone into doing one thing. So generally, getting more tanks, or different MM are not really that correlating to one another. Additionally, certain projects take more time to progress than others. Isn't it better to have some additional content which gets done faster, to spice up our gaming while we wait for long term projects.


TheKroo
First Public Test of Update 8.10
arrow
19.12.2013 19:41:51
 
Subject: First Public Test of Update 8.10
Link on message: #6748892

View PostThe_Boot, on 18 December 2013 - 04:53 PM, said: the background motion blur when you look around or zoom in is awful, I want to kill tanks not be amazed by the land scape. a good landscape is one burning and riddled with shell marks and destroyed vehicles, am I wrong?   get rid of the motion blur...

TheKroo:   For quite a lot of people the visual look of the game, the graphics and other content which set them mood are quite important. Agreed, gameplay and content are integral, but making the game look better should not be a negative thing. Why not be amazed by the landscape? Visually nicely portrayed map and appropriating visuals will in great length add to the general mood of the game you play.  

View PostThe_Boot, on 18 December 2013 - 04:56 PM, said: leave the graphic as they are, and concentrate on MM or new maps or even lag. I think the vast majority of the WoT community want better content than better lighting effects and rolling cloud shadow...

TheKroo:   We are talking about different departments, different specialties. Map designers, graphic editors, data analysts and general coders are not really one and the same. It is not possible just to redirect everyone into doing one thing. So generally, getting more tanks, or different MM are not really that correlating to one another. Additionally, certain projects take more time to progress than others. Isn't it better to have some additional content which gets done faster, to spice up our gaming while we wait for long term projects.


Hunter1911
Special: 2013 Retrospective
arrow
19.12.2013 19:22:21
 
Subject: Special: 2013 Retrospective
Link on message: #6748720

View Postkymrel, on 19 December 2013 - 06:16 PM, said: How little do you get paid? Most people would only need a few hours of overtime to simply buy the IS-6. Spending endless hours slaving to get one for "free" seems very expensive to me once you factor in the time you need to play.

Hunter1911:  

View Postkrazypenguin, on 19 December 2013 - 06:18 PM, said: It's not about the free tank or the cost or money.  It's about completing a challenge and achieving a goal.

Hunter1911:   And skipping work, I guess :P


TheKroo
Special: 2013 Retrospective
arrow
19.12.2013 19:22:21
 
Subject: Special: 2013 Retrospective
Link on message: #6748720

View Postkymrel, on 19 December 2013 - 06:16 PM, said: How little do you get paid? Most people would only need a few hours of overtime to simply buy the IS-6. Spending endless hours slaving to get one for "free" seems very expensive to me once you factor in the time you need to play.

TheKroo:  

View Postkrazypenguin, on 19 December 2013 - 06:18 PM, said: It's not about the free tank or the cost or money.  It's about completing a challenge and achieving a goal.

TheKroo:   And skipping work, I guess :P


Dakiras
25TH December
arrow
19.12.2013 19:03:03
 
Subject: 25TH December
Link on message: #6748534

Dakiras: Working, so for any who are around on the forums will be seeing my avatar all over this place.:izmena:


PanzerGert
Special: Rückblick auf 2013
arrow
19.12.2013 19:00:36
 
Subject: Special: Rückblick auf 2013
Link on message: #6748514

PanzerGert: Also auf deutsch gesagt, jedes Gefecht hat 2x XP, wenn man die ersten 2x XP des Tages (Gewinn des Gefechts) mit dem jeweiligen Panzer geschafft hat, davor nicht. :honoring:   Edit: keine 4fach XP, das einfache erste gewonnene Gefecht mit 2fach XP bleibt unberührt davon.


Hunter1911
E-75
arrow
19.12.2013 18:58:44
 
Subject: E-75
Link on message: #6748493

View Postfiladendro, on 19 December 2013 - 05:30 PM, said: Super,bilo kako bilo,moj savet(svima koji misle dobro o ovom tenkicu)nemoj mnogo da hvalite ovaj teknic,znam  da vecina ima dobro misljenje o e75 zato sto je tako ,ALI TO NIJE NIKAKO DOBRO ZA SAM E75.Kooooo razume sta hocu da kazem ODLICNO,ko ne razume,uvalice sam e75 u problem.Vec imamo takve primere,iskreno a gde to vodi(sami se zapitajte)?

Hunter1911:   Prekasno, sve sam cuo!


TheKroo
E-75
arrow
19.12.2013 18:58:44
 
Subject: E-75
Link on message: #6748493

View Postfiladendro, on 19 December 2013 - 05:30 PM, said: Super,bilo kako bilo,moj savet(svima koji misle dobro o ovom tenkicu)nemoj mnogo da hvalite ovaj teknic,znam  da vecina ima dobro misljenje o e75 zato sto je tako ,ALI TO NIJE NIKAKO DOBRO ZA SAM E75.Kooooo razume sta hocu da kazem ODLICNO,ko ne razume,uvalice sam e75 u problem.Vec imamo takve primere,iskreno a gde to vodi(sami se zapitajte)?

TheKroo:   Prekasno, sve sam cuo!


Hunter1911
Greska u prevodu u game clientu
arrow
19.12.2013 18:52:52
 
Subject: Greska u prevodu u game clientu
Link on message: #6748426

View Postlaponac, on 19 December 2013 - 05:43 PM, said: Kad pogledam misije koje slede tjs ova sutra - na sajtu i u engleskom klijentu igre pise: "x2 xp on every win" "x2 xp on every lose"   A kod nas pise: "pobedi u dve nasumicne borbe: x2 xp" "izgubi jednu nasumicnu borbu: x2 xp"    Jel to neka greska ili mi koji koristimo nas jezik za klijenat igre dobijamo x2 na svaku drugu pobedu?
  :tongue:

Hunter1911:   Lokalizacija je drugacije odradjena. Neovisno o jeziku klijenta, svi uvijek imaju iste misije, specijale itd.


TheKroo
Greska u prevodu u game clientu
arrow
19.12.2013 18:52:52
 
Subject: Greska u prevodu u game clientu
Link on message: #6748426

View Postlaponac, on 19 December 2013 - 05:43 PM, said: Kad pogledam misije koje slede tjs ova sutra - na sajtu i u engleskom klijentu igre pise: "x2 xp on every win" "x2 xp on every lose"   A kod nas pise: "pobedi u dve nasumicne borbe: x2 xp" "izgubi jednu nasumicnu borbu: x2 xp"    Jel to neka greska ili mi koji koristimo nas jezik za klijenat igre dobijamo x2 na svaku drugu pobedu?
  :tongue:

TheKroo:   Lokalizacija je drugacije odradjena. Neovisno o jeziku klijenta, svi uvijek imaju iste misije, specijale itd.


Hunter1911
Special: 2013 Retrospective
arrow
19.12.2013 18:50:37
 
Subject: Special: 2013 Retrospective
Link on message: #6748404

Hunter1911: X2 exp for all battles.  


TheKroo
Special: 2013 Retrospective
arrow
19.12.2013 18:50:37
 
Subject: Special: 2013 Retrospective
Link on message: #6748404

TheKroo: X2 exp for all battles.  


Dakiras
How long will WoT last?
arrow
19.12.2013 18:37:38
 
Subject: How long will WoT last?
Link on message: #6748284

{lang:macro__view_post}vibezzz, on 19 December 2013 - 05:23 PM, said: Wargaming has to do one very important thing if it wants to retain a large portion of it's fan base. That is to not listen to each and every single person. Look at what happened to World of Warcraft, Blizzard listened to the majority, made it a casual game and lost it's mojo. Almost like a double edged sword, do Wargaming listen to the players, or do they listen to themselves? Either way can be fatal and it's perhaps finding that happy medium that Wargaming need to do in order to ensure that longevity.

Dakiras:   There is definitely merit in what you say, and I agree with your final statement. There does indeed need to be a middle ground when it comes to implementing changes to the game.   Implementing every suggestions that is made by the playerbase isn't a productive way to do things, and what's important is that the game stays true to its goals and roots. That being said, with the industry being such a fast-paced one, it's important to adapt to the uncontrollable changes within the industry. Thus, player feedback comes into play. Happy medium is definitely the key.


Dakiras
Support Report for high Offensive Chat?
arrow
19.12.2013 18:28:27
 
Subject: Support Report for high Offensive Chat?
Link on message: #6748207

{lang:macro__view_post}BrokenWing, on 19 December 2013 - 04:01 PM, said: One function is enough, let WG do the filtering and sorting.

Dakiras:   ^ this. The filtering, contextualising, and judgment of severity can be done by us.


Hunter1911
Valiant loss in the Matilda - de Langlades, Cool-Headed, Steel Wall, Top Gun...
arrow
19.12.2013 18:23:34
 
Subject: Valiant loss in the Matilda - de Langlades, Cool-Headed, Steel Wall, Top Gun...
Link on message: #6748163

Hunter1911: A loss, but still a good battle.


TheKroo
Valiant loss in the Matilda - de Langlades, Cool-Headed, Steel Wall, Top Gun...
arrow
19.12.2013 18:23:34
 
Subject: Valiant loss in the Matilda - de Langlades, Cool-Headed, Steel Wall, Top Gun...
Link on message: #6748163

TheKroo: A loss, but still a good battle.


TheyCallMeHans
Valiant loss in the Matilda - de Langlades, Cool-Headed, Steel Wall, Top Gun...
arrow
19.12.2013 18:23:34
 
Subject: Valiant loss in the Matilda - de Langlades, Cool-Headed, Steel Wall, Top Gun...
Link on message: #6748163

TheyCallMeHans: A loss, but still a good battle.


Dakiras
Fail Moments - Read, Laugh, Learn to avoid them
arrow
19.12.2013 16:12:02
 
Subject: Fail Moments - Read, Laugh, Learn to avoid them
Link on message: #6747013

Dakiras: I've had at least 2 instances of epic shell dodging, then SPLOOSH.... yep. :facepalm:   And one where I wasn't paying attention, then SPLOOSH.


Реклама | Adv